« September 2011 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
My Blog
Tuesday, 20 September 2011
Speaking practice

I have decided to pay someone for speaking practice. I will do this six days a week for one hour a day. I will pay someone 10000 won for the hour. I think this is the best way. Moving to the countryside, hanging around bars, traveling the country, getting a job in the sticks are all going to cost money and there is no guarantee I will get the immersion I want. This way I get the immersion that fits my schedule and I can pick and choose the person who does the speaking to me. If they don't work out, I will find another person. The country is full of Koreans and I think I can find someone who wants to earn a bit of pocket money. I figure I only need to do this for a couple of months. Having one on one speaking immersion practice is the same as spending 6 hours in a class sharing the teacher with others so I think I am getting my money's worth doing this.

I will advertise for someone with no English knowledge whatsoever. This is the most helpful. I am forced to really try and concentrate on listening and I will be forced to communicate in Korean - in other words, this is real immersion, like being in a foreign country where no one speaks your native language. 

I had a bit of practice with this and found it MOST effective. People who know some English are hopeless for this. 

I've made it clear in my ad that the person must not speak English in the one hour and they must not be good speakers of English. 

If I am paying someone for this, they need to comply with these requirements and not try and fudge them in order to learn English from a foreigner. 

I think most people will realize what I am trying to do and because the money is not that good it will weed out the ones who are not that interested in the job.  

I need someone who REALLY wants that money and I think if they do they will be dedicated, show up on time, and give me what I need. 

The ads aren't cheap though ..... 

I don't know whether to get a kid for homestay in my home. I think it's best if it's someone I know. I think a kid is less complicated than an adult. I don't want an adult snooping around in my affairs. 

I have changed my mind about this. Adults are kind of difficult to live with. Children are more malleable. I think it will be fun to have a kid live with me. 

I can do my own thing and relax more. Adults are more judgmental and demanding. 

So I have this straightened out. I am surprised I hadn't thought of this. I think it was my Korean brother-in-law who discouraged me; he was outraged that I was thinking of paying someone for speaking practice when the country is full of Koreans. But it makes sense to do this and in fact it's a more effective method of learning to speak Korean than paying for classes at a language institute. 

Other people who have done the same thing - paid someone for language practice - have reported that it was very helpful and that it did them more good than paying to do a language course. I think it's better to pay 280000 won than pay 1000000 - 1500000 won for a language course for 1 - 2 months at SNU. At SNU, there will be a lot of stuff I already know so the teaching won't be individualized. They teach mostly grammar and simple phrases used in dialogs and I can learn these things better myself at home. So class time should only be for things I can't do myself so I think the SNU course won't be very helpful. 

The stuff I can't do myself is speak in Korean fluently to myself so I need to hire someone to do this one on one for me. This is the best use of the one hour I will have. 

It won't be easy but I think it will be fun trying to understand. I think at the end I will be moderately fluent - say, if I keep this up for six months. 

This will be the REAL way that Koreans speak. 

This is not the same as language exchange. I found that really HOPELESS. It did not help me at all. There is lack of commitment on both sides too. It's too easy to lose interest and then there is the problem of finding compatible schedules. Besides I think I was speaking more English to them than they were speaking to me. They were speaking very difficult Korean and didn't care whether I understood or not. If I was paying someone, it would be the hiree's job to make sure I understood. They would drop the level for me or explain things in a way that I could understand. 

So I think I will forget about language exchange and concentrate on immersion one-on-one practice for learning Korean speaking. 

For reading, I think I can teach myself. I am a bit of a bookworm anyway so I like this method of study. I am getting better at memorizing. I am using mnemonics as I have mentioned and it makes learning vocab fun and easier. I retain a lot more this way. I can't do it for long stints though. I run out of ideas for making mnemonics too. 

I think my goal is to be able to speak, read and write Korean well enough to pass the Korean language test they have for foreigners. If I could devote myself full time to studying, it would be better but I can't. Still I am making progress. I like watching videos and reading comics on the subway. I can fit a lot of study in two hours on the subway. I love reading fairytales. 

I can't read newspapers though. My vocabulary has to increase by a lot in order to do that and my understanding of Korean grammar has to also improve very much to read newspaper articles fluently. 

I still prefer English grammar and I am not just saying that because English is my native language. I have a better idea of Korean grammar now and I find it is more complex than English grammar. English grammar also employs punctuation which makes comprehension clearer. 

Anyway in a relatively short time I think I have improved a lot. About four weeks ago, I wouldn't have been able to read the fairytale books. 

I will concentrate on reading now and not worry too much about speaking. Speaking will come in time with immersion. It's a matter of just immersing oneself. Reading is very useful to me as I need to browse Korean internet sites sometimes. It's slowly changing from a jumble of unfamiliar characters to something recognizable. 

I think progress will be exponential. The early stages were a struggle but things are starting to make sense grammatically. I forgot a lot of the grammar but reading seems to jog my memory a little. 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 3:47 AM EDT
Reading progress

I am really improving my reading Korean. I don't know whether it's just an illusion or not. But I am reading fairytales - Andersen, Perrault, Grimm and so on and I am understanding quite a lot. Of course I have the English translations. But I still think I am improving my understanding of Korean grammar especially grammar of prose.

I am not picking up that much new vocabulary however. But the vocabulary I have learned by doing a little study has helped considerably. I am applying the grammar rules that I have learned from Korean Grammar in Use to the understanding of the Korean sentences in these books.

Jack and the Beanstalk was really understandable - the comic I mean which had mostly dialog. 

The fairytales are very good because there is a mixture of dialog and prose. 

If I continue reading lots and lots of books, not trying to get bogged down in the difficult parts overly, I think my progress will continue. 

I think the key is to read short stories and short comics with the English translations. With the comics I am picking up useful expressions. I won't be able to use them in speaking but I will understand the expressions immediately when I see them again in reading or when listening. 

It is starting to become more fun. I still can't read stuff for teenagers however. And I can't read stuff without translations. But I still think I am making progress more than before. I remember I couldn't read a page of comics without getting a headache even with translations. 

I think studying Korean Grammar in Use, Using Korean, and the vocabulary in the Magic book for Korean children really helped me. Now I feel very confident about reading. My listening of dialog is also getting better. Of course I don't understand too much of what they say in sageuks but I am picking up a lot in contemporary dramas.

So because of the lack of immersion, I am concentrating on reading. Even though speaking is important, reading is also essential to have as a skill. I am getting better I really think and I no longer go into glazed eye mode when I see Hangeul. 

I really am surprised. I think I've passed a milestone. I am "getting" Korean grammar. I do find it's much more complex than English grammar. 

The good thing about the fairytales is that there is a lot of repetition. 

I am taking advantage of the fact that there is an English-learning craze in Korea and that means there is a lot of material in the Korean children's section of bookstores.  Instead of using these books to learn English, I am using them to learn Korean. So I think this is the way to go instead of looking for books that teach Korean. I have all the Korean grammar books I need at this stage: Korean Grammar in Use, Using Korean, and Korean Grammar for International Learners. Between them they cover a lot of ground. I think I am ready to look into Using Korean and Korean Grammar for International Learners. 

I am not ready to speak or write but I plan to read reams of easy material that doesn't stretch me too much and that doesn't contain lots of new or hard vocabulary. Easy does it. So long as I am reading at a moderately rapid pace and am enjoying the reading, it's all good. 

That's the purpose of these children's books - to encourage children to read. The fairytales are really great. I am reading fairytales that I am not familiar with and skipping the others. I think I will also get Aesop's fables from the bookshop. The fairytale books are really cheap - only about 10 dollars each and they will last me a fairly long time. With the comics though, I finish them in two hours and so they seem a waste of money. 

I think I will read more, and then will learn some vocabulary and then study a bit more grammar - I will revise Korean Grammar in Use, go through the useful chapters of Using Korean, and then start on Korean Grammar for International Learners. I feel ready to tackle more difficult grammar at this stage. I am especially interested in improving my understanding of the passive tense. 

Whatsmore I am enjoying the studying a lot more (as I have said). It no longer seems an unfathomable mystery to me, the Korean language. 

I think this is because I am climbing out of the beginner stage. It's a good feeling to make this kind of progress. 

I think the more exposure and the more hours I spend reading Korean the more quickly I will progress. It's a matter of reading and reading. Even though my reading aloud is slow and my intonation and pronunciation awful, voiceless reading is not too bad. 

Long sentences can be a bit hard to understand however. I think at this stage I have most of the material I need and I do not really need to buy much more material. I looked for vocab books that taught advanced vocab but didn't like most of them. I think I have to do the memorization of more vocab if I am to progress onto the next stage and be able to read material aimed more at adults. 

So studying grammar, memorizing vocab, reading Korean with English translations available has led me to make a big leap in reading ability. 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 3:23 AM EDT
Friday, 16 September 2011
Reading easy books

Wow! I have really improved! I was reading a WOW comic "The Prince and the Pauper" by Mark Twain, and I understood a lot of it myself! The last WOW comic I read was difficult compared to this. I was struggling. Now I am not. And I am enjoying reading a little bit. Because of the pictures too I can guess a lot of the meaning even if I don't fully understand the dialogs. Because I am anal I am looking up every word I don't know in the Google Translate. But even without looking up the words, I can read through the comic quite fast and have reasonable comprehension. The word list in the comic books are just terrible but that's because they are more suited for a Korean speaker learning English and not for an English speaker learning Korean. That's why I still have to look up Google Translate (even though there is a translated vocab list). The grammar idiosyncracies don't worry me so much -- not like before. I have learned to ignore them and just try and understand the gist of what the characters are trying to say.

So I am making progress! 

I might get some friend to read the comic's dialogs for me and I will record the voice so I have an aural reference as well.  

Still, it's not the same as reading prose. But I want to read easy prose, not prose containing long sentences and more than one idea in a sentence. 

So I have to hunt down easy prose. It's not easy. Something that has a lot of pictures and easy to understand sentences. So far I am not having much success finding easy prose.

Then as I get better with reading, I can progress onto harder stuff, with more content that's suitable for adults. And then eventually, I will read newspapers and so on that all adults can read. That would be great when that day arrives! By then I would have read a lot I hope! Reams and reams of stuff and probably absorbed (subconsciously) the grammar. 

So because my situation is abnormal (for someone living in a country where the target language is spoken) and I am not getting exposure to the language from people around me, I have to study in an alternative way. This way involves self-study - learning some grammar and some vocabulary words - then reading material that is at the same level as I am (after doing the self-study). Then I study more - learning more vocabulary (and phrases) and perhaps learning more grammar -- and then doing some reading again -- at this time at a slightly higher level, and then repeating the process all over again.

To get some aural input, I watch contemporary dramas without (and with) subtitles. Doing this will help me with pronunciation and hopefully I will recognize some words I have learned through self-study. My ear will get used to certain phrases. These are the ones that are spoken commonly in conversation. I will learn these phrases and their meanings without consciously parsing the grammar. Because I learn these phrases to the point where saying them is automatic, I will have absorbed the grammar in these phrases. 

So all these disparate activities help. I don't know if I am learning slower than I would if I was in full immersion but immersion is out of the question at the moment. I don't really want to hang out at hofs -- not my scene at all (I don't even drink ... as in practically NEVER) -- and I don't imagine myself living in a hasuk. I don't know where to find one. I might get a friend to help me find one. 

The other idea I have is traveling around Korea and just staying in yeogwans, Buddhist temples and similar places, by myself and interacting with the locals. I think this is a good idea. I might do this when I have worked out a plan/itinerary. I do like the sound of this. I might do it as an experiment to see whether I can get some kind of immersion this way and also if I do, if immersion works to improve my language ability. 

I really am itching for immersion.

 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 5:18 AM EDT
How long does it really take to learn a language?

It really depends on your exposure to the language in your environment and your innate ability.

Is studying grammar and attending classes in a language institution harmful if done too early? 

Maybe I am being too ambitious setting a goal of six months. In one way it motivates me because I have this pressure to learn a language within a certain time frame but on the other hand if I am nowhere near this goal then I will be disappointed in myself. 

Because I have little exposure to natural immersion, I have to do things a little differently to what is ideal. I have to use this time to learn vocabulary. The problem is if I am not exposed to the words I have learned in a book or movie (which puts the word in context), I am going to forget the word. Ideally, I want to read children's books because they are easy to read and I can progress upwards. This is how I learned to read English. I remember my sister teaching me to read with the Disney Golden series, I think the first book was Cinderella, and I recall feeling frustrated because I could hardly read a word. I don't remember what happened after that, but the next thing I knew I was reading all the Disney Golden books we had at home and understanding them. 

Then I took out seven books every week from the children's section and read them, starting with the really simple ones and moving onto progressively harder ones. I DID look up a dictionary for words that were unfamiliar to me. I think I did that a lot because I remember the children's dictionary that I used. It was a much-loved dictionary and it had a few black and white drawings. 

I really taught myself to read and also taught myself spelling too. My father bought me some spelling books which were helpful because in the school I attended the education was really of bad quality. Because I was taking out seven books a week, I eventually read ALL the books in the children's section. I did this in about a year, two years - I can't remember. 

Then I progressed onto the older children section and then onto the adult section (when I was eleven -- I was reading Agatha Christie back then and also dabbling in Emily Bronte which I found very hard at first and then progressively easier). 

So reading is the key. I LOVED reading I remember. I became a bookworm. 

I wonder if I can do this with Korean. As I said it's hard to find stuff that's easy to read. I don't think reading the WOW is helpful because it has a lot of ban mal in the dialogs. I think prose is easier. I don't know where to find easy prose. I need something that has easy vocabulary. 

I think the path is easier if I start off with really easy stuff and work my way upwards. Then I will be a good reader at least if not a good speaker. I can absorb the grammar just by reading rather than listening. Although I will keep up the listening by watching contemporary dramas without subtitles (but I am getting to hate romance dramas with their tortured storylines and characters). 

And if I am a good reader I can read Hangeul quickly which makes my progress faster. At the moment, I read Hangeul VERY slowly. I read Romanization much faster than Hangeul. Though I think I am making progress in this area too. Sometimes I intend to write Romanization and I end up writing Hangeul instead before realizing what I am doing. 

As I said, the readers have to be very easy. No complex sentences. Just one subject and one verb. That kind of thing. The books I have contain complex sentences. And no ban mal at this stage, I repeat. Ban mal confuses the heck out of me. People say ban mal is easier to learn than other forms but for me this is not the case. I find the informal polite style, the "yo" style, the easiest to recognize and learn, probably because this is the style I learned from the outset. And banmal has different forms and in speaking people switch between the two forms so it all becomes very complicated. My mind can't deal with complexities like that. I like things to be logical and not a mishmash. 

Until I get those easy readers I think I will read the WOW comics. When I study vocab and a bit of grammar and then read again, the reading is easier. I can read a bit faster and not be stumped by every second word. If I can get access to the Little Golden Books (Disney) in Korean that would be great. Those books are at my level and don't have too much dialog (and ban mal). Then I can read harder stuff and progress from there. Because I have little exposure to immersion, I have to use this method. 

It's a bit embarrassing to admit that you read children's books at my age but it's all for a good cause. The stuff available for adults isn't really suitable for reading. They are mostly dialogs and there is very little prose. 

If I learned English that way then it will work for Korean, and remember I had the advantage of being immersed in English when I was learning English whereas with Korean, I am not. 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 3:34 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, 16 September 2011 4:08 AM EDT
Thursday, 15 September 2011
Watching without English subtitles

I have tried watching Winter Bird the first episode without the English subtitles and I found it wasn't too bad. It happened by accident as I came across the movie without the subtitles unintentionally and didn't realize it didn't have subtitles until I started watching it.

And it forces me to concentrate on the Korean speaking more. I think I switched off the listening a little when I watched with subtitles. 

I cannot do this with sageuks though because the language is too difficult and has very little to do with real life. So I think I will try this more but only with contemporary dramas. 

I always have the subtitled version online if I need to look at subtitles. 

The language is simple so far. Just everyday phrases, for example, "piryoobssumnida". LTG says, "There is no need" to his mother when she offers him something when he returns home late inebriated.

I don't understand everything of course but I think watching subtitles IS helpful. I can also slow the movie on my Galaxy Player. I love this Galaxy Player! I always thought I would get an Apple product like an iPhone or iTablet as I am a mac girl (I have had mostly Apple computers and currently have two MacBook Airs), but I was attracted to the features of the Galaxy Player. It had a five inch screen. I can play YouTube videos. I can have the player option (no phone 3G access, just wifi) which is cheaper, and I can watch TV and also record programs on it (you might be able to do that with Apple products - I am not sure). 

The five inch screen is the thing that sealed the deal for me. I did not want to spend a lot as I would have to for the Galaxy 7 inch tablet and I really did not need that size screen as I would use the player mainly for watching videos. And the 10 inch iTablet was too big and expensive and also did not have YouTube and TV. 

The four inch was a bit smaller than I would have liked so the five inch was just right and was only about 100,000 won more expensive. 

So I got the five inch Galaxy Player which I really like. Not many people have it. They mostly have the four inch Galaxy tab/player or the smaller iPhone. 

I love playing videos on the Galaxy Player while sitting on the train or the bus. But if I watch sageuks on it (with or without subtitles) I am not getting much benefit from it. 

I think this is not too bad. If I learn more vocabulary I can understand more of these dramas. And the Korean is very colloquial and natural. 

Honestly, it isn't too hard to understand the gist of what the people are saying. All the studying I have done in the past eight weeks (and if I really think about it the study can be compressed into four weeks of INTENSIVE study) must have helped me -- made a difference. I am really glad about that. I should just keep this up. I think I will watch more to pick up the grammar (subconsciously) and not really for vocabulary.

So all that studying HAS made a difference. I think the study of the vocabulary is really important and I will study a bit more of "Surviving Korean".  I like the children's book though too so I will study these two books alternately.

Off topic and speaking of dramas, I feel sorry for the second leads in these dramas, the people who are not really loved by the main characters and so on. If I were an actor I would not want to play these roles. It means I am not attractive enough to be offered the leading role. It would typecast me as a secondary character actor. I think I would rather stop being an actor than resign myself to the fact that I will always be the second bit player and never the first. It would be too much for my ego. LOL.

For example, I could never accept the role of the woman who was scorned by the male lead in Bulsae. That was too much. She really humiliated herself. She had to in that character. How can she play someone like that and then play the lead actress in another drama? Her character was really pathetic and she ended up killing herself. 

I am also a firm believer that what you act out in real life, even if it's pretend-acting in a movie as an actor, affects you eventually. What I mean is if you act like you are injured in a movie, you are going to be injured in real life. It might be superstitious to think that way but I have seen many examples of this happening. For example, Christopher Reeve played a character who was paralyzed in a movie and later in real life, he was in a horse riding accident and WAS paralyzed. 

So acting in movies where you are injured, hurt, dumped, betrayed etc could set you up for the same thing later ... this is dark but it's just what I have observed. Maybe I am reading too much into things. But maybe the subconscious brain is more powerful than we think it is.

So the corollary of this is that as an actor I would go for the parts where I end up triumphant and not be in parts where I am hurt, dumped, not loved, killed off, suicided etc. or am just a second string player. Because it could impact me like that in real life. 

If I get offered these roles where I receive a bad fate all the time, I would rethink my career as an actor seriously. 

I feel sorry for those actors who have to play the villain and end up hurt and killed. I think there should be some sort of ceremony before and after the filming where an exorcism is carried out. To drive out the evil spirits and restore the person to what they were before. So that the acting of these parts does not affect them. 

 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 9:04 PM EDT
Korean dramas are too long!

I started to watch a new Korean drama and even though I like the lead actor A LOT - Lee Tae Gon, I am hesitant about starting to watch it. From a preview of the first episode, it seems like it's going to be boring. I really don't like these love triangle stories that involve forbidden love between step sister, adopted sister and so on and brother. The theme makes me sick. How can you fall in love with someone that you grew up with as a child? That's so demented. As a parent, I would not approve, just as I wouldn't approve of siblings falling in love and marrying. They may not be genetically siblings but EMOTIONALLY, SOCIALLY and FUNCTIONALLY they are siblings ...

Lee Tae Gon seems to be in dramas with this plot a lot: Dear Heaven, Winter Bird, Golden Fish .. three! 

I think this drama (Winter Bird) is going to be boring. Like Love in Heaven (Dear Heaven), the female lead is going to act sulky and unhappy and robotic. She is going to be dutiful and enter a marriage with someone she doesn't love. LTG is going to look wistfully at her and the two will make the lives of those people around them, especially their partners, miserable. Eventually, they get together and there is either a happy ending or a bittersweet one (the writers can't bring themselves to give them just pure unalloyed happiness, they have to introduce some sadness to their love in the end). 

Gawd, having to wade through 50 episodes of this just to pick up some Korean ... and these are the dramas I can stand (just barely) to watch! 

If I feel like this about these dramas that are on top of my list, imagine the other dramas that aren't ...... 

I did enjoy Dear Heaven a little but would have enjoyed it a lot more if they had cut it down by half. Did they have to show EVERY meeting between the two lovers? Did they have to show what they did on their honeymoon? Honestly, the drama DID exactly that. A family drama, not a porn movie, by the way. It had LTG almost naked doing a sexy strip dance for his bride on his honeymoon night. LOL. It showed everything practically except those two having sex. It even showed what they did the next morning afterwards while they laid in bed. It's kind of voyeuristic. Soft porn. What were the writer and director thinking? 

I don't know if I want to start on Winter Bird. It seems another version of Love in Heaven. 

I also saw Autumn Sonata (?name) with Song Seung Hyun, Won Bin and Song Hye Go and the theme was love between adopted sister and brother.

That dragged on too. 

The actresses who are the protagonists all act like zombies in these dramas. 

I don't think I can stand it. I think I will skip and fast forward through all the slow bits, but then that ruins the purpose of watching these dramas for learning Korean. 

I don't know what to do. I want to watch dramas to learn English but there are many obstacles. Either the dramas are too long and boring or the subtitles aren't very helpful. I have noticed that the subtitles are distracting me from listening to the Korean. 

But I can't watch these dramas WITHOUT reading the English subtitles so "ottohke?" 

And they speak so fast too. I just can't face another long drama. How do Koreans stand it? How can they hold out for a week to watch the next episode or the next few episodes (for the ones that have several episodes per week)? Don't they start to lose interest? Especially as all the dramas have the same plot? They are so predictable. I am really sick of this brother-sister thing. I would be outraged if I knew that someone was marrying his sister (even if they weren't related by blood). Well, not outraged as it wouldn't be my business ... but sickened by it. I wouldn't think much of those people; they would be creeps in my eyes. 

Imagine their feelings towards each other as they grew up in the same household ... ugh!!! 

It's not natural. 

It's really hard to find input that is comprehensible and enjoyable. I don't like talking to Koreans very much because they are very boring people. 

The celebrities are interesting but they aren't ordinary people. 

I am getting sick of Korean TV now. I used to be into it starting a few months ago but am losing interest. I still haven't watched the contemporary drama I bought from Yongsan. I was disappointed by Chuno and the main actress in that is also in the contemporary drama. Why is she a lead actress? She is so unattractive. She looks plain, like a horse. I can't imagine the guy in Chuno trying to find her for ten years. She isn't someone likely to inspire that kind of devotion. I don't find Jang Hyuk all that attractive either. I don't like his personality. I didn't like ANYONE in that series except for the bad guy, the son-in-law of the powerful person who tries to hunt down Oh Ji Ho. He's kind of good looking. I wonder why he doesn't get the main acting roles. He seems to always get supporting roles. 

That drama is very low quality. It's pathetic how it tried to modernize the sageuk format. It didn't fit and cheapened it. And I hated the troupe girl who was in it. She seemed like a lot of the whiny superficial bitchy Seoulite girls I have come across. She seemed too modern for a sageuk.

No, there was nothing redeeming in this story. I didn't like any of the characters in it except for one, as I have said. 

I wish I had never watched it, let alone spent so much money buying it. 

I am glad I didn't buy all those dramas that the people recommended at the Sinyongsan place. It would have been a waste of money.  They would just be sitting there on my bookshelf. I would skim through the first episode and then think, "Forget about it". 

I think I am most interested in translating Saint Marie though the work is hard and the writing is confusing -- much ban mal.

I just want to find the ending - episode 7 - so I will translate that and the second chapter which I have started on. 

But I am having trouble finding episode 7. I might have to go to Kyobo and order it or get a friend to buy it off the internet. 

I found episodes 1-6 at a dvd/manwha store but no episode 7! Why do they do stuff like that? 

I went to Bandi and Lunis in Sillim but they didn't have episode 7 either. That book store chain is hopeless -- they don't have anything! 

That reminds me, I have to return the manwha series to the dvd store. 

I really like that manwha series though I usually don't like paranormal stuff. 

I wonder what happens in the end -- who triumphs? Black king or white king? Who does Da-in go off with? 

I am just bored by Korea. People are really brutal here. It's dog eat dog. And they have a very funny English education system.

I don't know if I have a future in Korea. I'm feeling kind of down these days. I was optimistic about living in Korea recently, but just some factors like the difficulty in learning Korean because of the lack of immersion opportunities, the terrible housing -- dirty, old, unsanitary, small, windowless, boxlike - are  getting me down. I don't like Nowon-gu and I want to get out of here but I don't know where to go. I want to live in an apartment but I can't afford it in most areas. And I can't get people to speak to me in Korean except taxi drivers. (Just the ten minutes with the taxi driver in Beomgye and I picked up several new words without trying.) I think I will have to put out an ad for language exchange partners or find a site on the web for that. I think the latter is the most viable option for me. Meeting people in person doesn't seem to work out. Scratch that -- I have made a good friend by doing that but am not using the friendship for language practice. He's quite unusual for a Korean. Most Koreans are materialistic and shallow. He's quite interested in Korean history and politics -- subjects that interest me, and he's knowledgeable about international affairs. 

So I need to find more people like that. People I enjoy talking to. I don't want to make friends of people just because we are in the same workplace. That's a mistake. If I do not like these people and have nothing in common I shouldn't socialize with them. 

I want to meet my cousin who is a communist as he seems to be very interesting. He wrote a book on Mao that nobody has bought and read. But it seems like it's some kind of epic book with years of research put into it. But Koreans aren't interested in Mao. However, my cousin won't give me the contact information of his younger brother (the communist). This seems rather churlish as I requested the person's number from him quite pointedly. I asked him many times. It's kind of wrong to have your personal feelings get involved in a situation like this. He's not the family gatekeeper and shouldn't act like one. This cousin is quite good at English I think as he was almost ready to take on a job working for the US Post Office a few years back. The communist cousin in the end turned his back on that because he didn't like America and didn't want to work there. This is understandable and I admire someone sticking up for his/her principles in that way. There are many people in Korea who would have loved to have had that job offered them and the chance to have a new life in the US (with a good safe job like that lined up). His siblings (my other cousins) in the US were really disappointed as they organized this job for him and thought it was a good opportunity for him. I think this cousin is depressed as it's hard to find a job in his situation and generally. I think he's living off his wife's earnings while he writes books that nobody reads. They have one son. His wife is a Chinese language teacher. She is of Korean ethnicity and she emigrated to Korea from China. I suppose he could get a job as a taxi driver but then he wouldn't have time to do his research and writing. I think this cousin is very bright -- he's an intellectual is the impression I get. Intellectuals like these are lazy about their careers. They just want to think, read and write. They need time to do that. It's kind of hard working 12 hours a day at another job and then doing this kind of thing. It's lonely work actually too. It's not as great as people think it would be. I did do that kind of thing for a while. I didn't want to socialize. I got too caught up in my research and didn't want my concentration broken. 

It's interesting to find out that many geniuses end up in ordinary jobs. (Not that I am a genius by any stretch -- LOL. My cousin says our paternal grandfather and paternal grandmother were geniuses but I think I will take that with a grain of salt and put it down to exaggeration and wishful thinking.) Like Kin Ung Yong and Chris Langdon. I can understand why. They want to live as ordinary people, they got to earn their bread, they want a job that doesn't take up too much of their time and effort so that they can concentrate on their real interests. They don't want to be treated like freaks. There are too many expectations placed on them and they don't like the restrictions. They want to live life on their own terms. Why should they care what other people think? If they don't want to be a cancer researcher or NASA scientist why should they be just because the dumb public expects it of them? They are not understood by many people and because of this there is a large potential for conflict -- being in an easy stress-free job means there is less room for interpersonal conflict and stress that arises from it.

It must be very lonely being a genius. You must feel alienated from people. Most people seem trivial and boring. You have to fake an interest in them just to get along and not seem standoffish. You really do not understand other people. They seem childlike and simple and it's frustrating for you because you have to always adjust your level down in order to communicate and interact with them. And if you are not accepted then you are lonely and have no one to have real interesting conversations with or to confide in or be intimate with. The thing is that geniuses on the whole are the least arrogant people around. They are already quite alienated so they don't want to alienate themselves from others even more by being arrogant, boastful and show-offish. And it's not nice to feel lonely. So they try and fit in which means having to downplay the differences they have such as intelligence level.

In many ways I think geniuses get on better with people who are "hoi polloi". Intellectuals and brainy people (but not geniuses) and mediocre people who think they are smart become jealous of these geniuses and always try and pull them down and show that these geniuses are not that great after all.  And they can do this in subtle ways. If a person who is just a blue collar worker finds out that there is a genius in his midst and feels jealous he would show his resentment; a fight would break out and everything would be resolved quickly once he releases those emotions. But a person who considers himself/herself as clever but is not in the same echelon as geniuses are when it comes to intellectual ability can be troublesome in a more insidious way. Their resentment is more of a seething one. They cannot accept the genius for what he/she is because they seem to think that this person's genius detracts from their own persona. It makes them feel inferior -- lacking somehow. And they can secretly work to do much damage to the genius. Usually the incidents are not open-handed but the opposite -- very underhanded. The jealous person really can't help themselves. It's just something that they can't control -- the perception that their ego is somehow hurt by the presence of the genius person. 

Often it's mediocre people who aspire to intellectual greatness but can't quite make it who are like this. They are very ambitious and have pretensions that they can be intellectuals, academics or just think they are smarter than they actually are. Some of them try and earn advanced degrees mostly for the "boasting" factor. If they have this degree they can boast to others that this degree "proves" they possess more intelligent than the average Joe or Jane. However, the truth is that these people have very ordinary intelligence. There are many people like this in Korea. I have seen their PhD papers and realize they are writing rubbish and that they are not really highly intelligent -- just average. But they can't accept that fact and continue to delude themselves. Unlike real intellectuals and geniuses these people aren't even interested in the topic that they study their PhD in. They just chose the major because it was easy to get in to. 

There are many WOMEN who are like this in Korea. They have delusions of grandeur and are not really suited for the academic/intellectual life. They resent really smart people like geniuses because these geniuses show these people up for what they really are. 

I think this person (my communist cousin) would be interesting to talk to. I resent my cousin from preventing contact with him from taking place. He won't give me his brother's phone number. This cousin that I have been in contact with seems like an a****** the more I meet him. He's very controlling. I don't like this kind of personality in a male. It is what turned me off from Korean men for a long time. 

 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 4:45 PM EDT
Comparing Korean, Japanese and Chinese

Which language is the most difficult? It's hard to say. Each language has its advantages and disadvantages when it comes to learning them for the English speaker.

With Korean, the writing is the easiest (and therefore the reading) because the phonetic script, Hangeul, is used. But the disadvantages are that the grammar is the hardest to learn out of the three (Korean grammar is said to be 10 times harder than Japanese grammar even though they share many similarities), and the pronunciation of Korean words is difficult. 

With respect to the Japanese language, the writing system is very difficult because you have to learn Kanji and two other writing systems. But the pronunciation of Japanese is easy. 

Now with Chinese, the grammar is easier than the other two, but one has to learn Hanja and one has to learn tones. 

So in the end, it's really hard to say which language is the hardest to learn. And besides I haven't tried to learn Japanese or Chinese so these comments are just based on my observations as an outsider. 

 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 9:28 AM EDT
Learning vocabulary and phrases

I've found that learning both individual words and phrases is helpful. I have been learning vocabulary from a Korean children's book for learning English. I use it to learn Korean of course. It's been great. I probably cannot recall most of the words I've learned but if I come across the word somewhere else with the English definition, I can memorize the word faster on this occasion. The book has 600 words. The words are basic words that a beginner should know. I am also going through a phrase book, "Surviving Korean" and many of the words are familiar and do not take very long to learn because I already encountered them in the vocabulary book.

I have found that it's really useful to learn these words. "Surviving Korean" is good because the word is demonstrated in very simple sentences. 

I have started to learn phrases today. I am learning from another children's book for learning English. The sentences are really simple. Some of them have colloquial phrases. 

I recognize most of the vocabulary in the sentences now because I studied the vocabulary book. 

So it's more a matter of memorizing phrases than memorizing vocabulary. 

I repeat the phrase aloud 40x. I read the phrase very slowly the first few times and then I speed up and eventually say the phrase very fast. I try not to read the phrase after the first few times.

Most of the phrases are simple, but if I come across a complex one I memorize chunks of it. 

I don't worry about parsing the grammar of the sentence overly. I just concentrate on memorizing the phrase. 

I am sure I am going to immediately forget most of the phrases I've learned but I think if I come across the phrases in the future and try and learn them, the learning phase will be much quicker. In the sense, future learning of the phrase is revision. I don't have to make as much effort to memorize the phrase again. 

And if I come across the phase in reading I can understand it and not stress too much about the grammar of the phrase which I tend to do when I am translating a phrase for the first time. 

It does take a long time to repeat a phrase 40x. But I think it's useful. I like this book because it goes beyond the usual conversational phrases such as greetings, ordering a meal and so on. I am sick of these types of phrases actually. Almost every book I have studied has these phrases repeated. Then I get stuck in greetings, grow bored and then don't go past greetings. 

The children's book I am studying from has interesting characters like Mr Fox. 

So I have to just persist with this kind of thing as I am having trouble finding an environment I can immerse myself in and have COMPREHENSIBLE INPUT. 

That is the thing. Watching TV can be considered "immersion" at a pinch I guess, but the content of it is incomprehensible so it's mostly useless. 

Also, I like these books because unlike movies with English subtitles, they don't stray too far from the literal meanings of the words. There is less interpretation done by the translator. 

So the English subtitles thing might be really damaging for me and harming my efforts to learn the language. I don't mind a translation that is far from the literal translation but so long as a word-for-word (or close to it as possible) exists somewhere. 

Because literal translations give a clue as to how Koreans think when using language. 

So that's my pet gripe about English subtitles. There should be an industry where there are literal translations given for the benefit of the language learner. If they provided these for my favorite dramas, I would buy them in a flash because this kind of thing is EXACTLY what I am looking for. 

So I have to just keep memorizing phrases. One day I will wake up and realize that I can SPEAK Korean fluently because I have learned so many phrases. I hope that day happens soon. 

Korean grammar is SOO different to English grammar. This is what makes the language so hard. You can't rely on learning a grammar rule and making substitutions as much. You have to rely more on just memorizing phrases and then hoping the grammar sticks in your brain eventually. Repetition then seeing the same phrase in another source are the keys. 

Of course using mnemonics helps when learning new vocabulary. I found that using mnemonics really helped me with the study of vocabulary words. 

I think after a certain stage, one's learning just accelerates. This happens when one has x number of vocab words under one's belt and y number of phrases. After that, learning depends just on exposing oneself to the Korean language. You will pick up more of the language like a sponge. You don't have to make such a big effort. Unlike the initial stages, you will retain phrases without having to do rote memorization, just by the virtue of coming across the same phrases many times in different reading materials or on TV, movies, radio etc. 

I really am impatient for that day when that happens. That will be when I can read for pleasure. Improving my vocabulary then is a matter of looking up a word or two that I am unfamiliar with. And I won't have to memorize phrases. 

Then I can concentrate on being an advanced learner of the language -- college level user of the language. 

It's much harder for me to do that than for people like The Korean (Ask the Korean blog); I am not immersed in the language like The Korean was. 

Oh well. I did try. I got language partners but I found them pretty much USELESS. They didn't try and provide comprehensible input, spoke about boring topics and just forgot most of the time to speak in Korean and lapsed into English (when it was their turn to speak in Korean). 

I can't help feeling sore about some of the partners. I felt I was making much more of an effort than they were. I really need a language partner or teacher who is gentle and understands the theory behind language learning techniques and is enthusiastic about applying these rules. 

I have to say Korean is a rubbish language. The rules in informal speech are plastic. Even Koreans don't know how to use banmal correctly in speech! What kind of language is that? It lacks the grammatical sense that English has. For example, a sentence in Korean can read either as  "tiger scared" or "tiger is scary".  In English, it's impossible to be confused as to the meaning. Korean grammar rules are bad; they don't make sense some of the time. I prefer English grammar. I prefer English as a language. It's a lot more logical. 

Colloquial Korean is the worst! It really tries my patience parsing the grammar of it. 

I just can't wait for the day that I have reached late intermediate level and can read Korean fluently. That would be good. At this point, I am not a fluent reader. Every sentence stumps me. And I am talking about simple Korean readers. I also need to find easy material. The children's books are good because the level is kept low. When they teach adults, they don't do this. They skip these early steps. 

I just wish I was a genius. Then it would take a month to learn a language fluently. Can you imagine how great that would be? There is a Korean genius - Kim Un Yong - and he learned about three other languages (other than Korean) by the time he was five or so. He appeared on Japanese TV and showed his fluency in these languages. 

"Shortly after birth, Kim began to display extraordinary intellectual ability. He began speaking at 4 months, could converse fluently by 6 months, and was able to read Japanese, Korean, German, and English by his second birthday. Furthermore, it took him about a month to learn a foreign language ..." (from Wikipedia).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 SO CUTE

It would make life so much easier if learning Korean was a breeze. Korean is one of the most difficult languages to learn for English speakers and I suspect in general for everyone (except for the Japanese - almost the same grammar - and the Chinese people - many words are the same in both languages).

"By the age of four he was already able to read in Japanese, Korean, German, and English. At his fifth birthday, he solved complicated differential and integral calculus problems. Later, on Japanese television, he demonstrated his proficiency in Chinese, Spanish, Vietnamese, Tagalog, German, English, Japanese, and Korean. Kim was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records under “Highest IQ“; the book estimated the boy’s score at over 210.

 Kim was a guest student of physics at Hanyang University from the age of 3 until he was 6. At the age of 7 he was invited to America by NASA. He finished his university studies, eventually getting a Ph.D. in physics at Colorado State University before he was 15."

I think his real IQ is much higher than 210. It's probably immeasurable. At least 1000 or something. 

Who taught him these languages? Was there a native-speaking teacher? Did he use books? Without being exposed to people speaking these languages, how did he know how to pronounce words correctly and have the correct intonation? Back in the 60s there wasn't the availability of language-learning materials as there are today. Did he use the immersion technique - an accelerated form of it (instead of immersing oneself for six months for example, he immersed himself for a month)? I doubt that he was immersed in these languages in that he had a native speaker talk to him for at least a couple of hours a day. But he must have been fluent if he was able to speak in these languages on TV. I wish there was a recording of that on Youtube. That would be great. It would really motivate me to learn Korean and try harder learning it. 

I think we need to study those people who have been able to learn a foreign language and be fluent in it (speaking AND writing) in less than six months to find out what is their secret to learning languages and attaining fluency in them. If they say they learned by memorizing vocabulary and phrases then I would do the same. If they said they did a lot of listening and reading, I would do the same. If they said they studied grammar most of the time, I would do the same and so on ... 

Of course it would not necessarily mean that my learning improved as it could be that these geniuses have very different wirings of their brains so that whatever method they used wouldn't work for normal people, but still ..... 

I am interested in getting Rosetta Stone. This fits in with my style of learning which is highly visual. I like looking at pictures. Seeing English translations distracts me and makes me focus on English. It's just the cost. Is it better to invest that money in say paying someone to speak in Korean, making trips to the hinterland where there aren't many English speakers ... or something else? 

I want anything that SPEEDS up my language acquisition.  I am interested in minimizing the TIME spent learning. So I am investigating the most EFFICIENT and most EFFECTIVE ways of learning languages.

 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 8:16 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 15 September 2011 9:36 AM EDT
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
A response to an article by "Ask a Korean".

I read this article on a blog called "Ask a Korean":

http://askakorean(dot)blogspot.com/2010/01/koreans-english-acquisition-and-best.html

QUOTE

The Korean's English Acquisition, and the Best Method to Master a Foreign Language, Guaranteed

Dear Korean,

My name is The English Teacher. The English Teacher has a question for The Korean. The English Teacher read .....

ENDQUOTE

 

MY COMMENT: (I wanted to add the following comment to the comments in Ask a Korean's blog but my comment was too long and wasn't accepted so I am putting the comment here.) 

I think rote memorization definitely has its place but I don't think it's possible to be fluent in speaking and writing without immersion (unless you are a genius). The Korean obviously had immersion but does not really see the value of the immersion that he had. He had immersion by attending classes in school for some 6 hours a day, then the immersion on the playground during lunchtime, immersion by visiting friends who spoke English, immersion by joining clubs, immersion by general interaction with native speakers outside the classroom, immersion by all the signs in English he passed by every day, immersion by watching television even if the watching was passive ...

You don't have to be gifted to be fluent in speaking in English after attending an English-speaking school in America or similar countries. There are many examples of people who became verbally fluent after one or two years of attending school after emigration.  

It's the IMMERSION that got those kids to be fluent, not memorization. Some of those kids were not studious but they still became fluent in SPEAKING.

Now writing and reading comprehension are a different ballgame altogether. It's pretty impossible to become a great writer in a foreign language and have good reading comprehension without doing study that involves rote memorization.

But if a person already is fluent in SPEAKING, reading and writing in the second language become infinitely easier. Why? Because most of the grammar has been acquired and can be reproduced in writing so long as one is literate.

But if there is no studying (memorization of vocabulary and study of grammar including study of spelling), then the writing is not going to be very good -- like a first grader's. The person will be a poor speller, not use long and complex words to express themselves articulately in writing and so on.

But if speaking fluency is mastered then the rest of the stuff is much easier to pick up (increasing one's vocabulary to cover those in literature like Brothers Karamazov, learning SAT-level grammar, and being able to have good spelling will become easier).

The fact that immersion brought The Korean up to a much higher level in a very quick way is attested to by the fact that he only needed closed captioning (and not Korean subtitles) when watching the Simpsons. If he had not picked up English grammar and many vocab words through immersion, he would not have been able to understand The Simpsons half as well as he did.

So IMMERSION is really necessary for 95% of people to bring them up to a moderate level of fluency in speaking and writing. But writing requires extra -- it requires also memorization and "forced" study.

Without immersion, not many people become fluent -- as I've said those geniuses or polyglots (not the ones who study all day but the ones who pick up languages effortlessly without really trying) are the only ones who do not need immersion: they probably only need to hear the word once or read it once and it's locked in their brain forever.

For us ordinary mortals, it's impingent on us to immerse ourselves as much as we can and if we also want to read Korean books and media as well as write in Korean, we have to apply ourselves diligently to study.

Obviously The Korean had motivation to excel in reading and writing as getting into a good university was a priority for him. So that's where the memorization is very important. Especially in his case as he didn't have much time to cram all the English he needed to do well in the verbal SAT -- he had two years to do that while American-born students have 18 years.

But The Korean DID spend some time learning English when in Korea. Admittedly, not very much and not really the English skills he needed for speaking. However, this education DID ready him (prepare him) for the input he received when he immersed himself in English (when his parents took the family to the US). It made a large part of the input he received COMPREHENSIBLE and set him up to acquire English relatively quickly - more quickly than someone going into the environment cold.

However, it's still remarkable what people can achieve once they are exposed to an immersion environment. Adults who go to Korea to work as 3D workers, adults who marry a Korean and live with the Korean in-laws ... adults like these pick up Korean very quickly. In a couple of years they are fluent.

I don't think the majority of these people actively study as such. Of course, without study their reading comprehension and writing are probably very poor, but if at a later date they needed these skills the fact that they were verbally fluent would help them learn these skills faster than someone who did not have these skills.

But these examples show how IMPORTANT immersion is for speaking fluency (and for writing fluency with the caveat that the person do the necessary memorization of vocab and study of grammar to supplement the immersion).  

If The American had been in Korea and was spending all that time studying English instead of going to school, I doubt he would have achieved the level of proficiency that he did in America after two years. Why? Because staying in Korea, he would not have been in an immersion environment. For one thing, he would not have had as many English language TV programs to watch and they would have mostly Korean subtitles (not English cc). And even if he had English closed captioning for this TV series, he would be struggling to understand it because his English listening skills would be less than optimal for understanding a show like that because he would not have the immersion environment to bring them up to scratch.

So immersion was probably the MAJOR factor as to why his English improved phenomenally once he was in the US but The Korean doesn't realize it and instead attributes it to studying those lists and flash cards.

I too studied English grammar and spelling and memorized vocabulary from 19th and 18th century literature, but that was more for scoring highly in university entrance exams. I didn't really need to do these things for just becoming fluent in English in speaking, writing and reading.

I don't think the intensive study the Korean did was responsible for his becoming fluent in English -- though it WAS responsible for him acing the SAT exam.

So he needs to consider the two things separately --  what it takes to acquire speaking fluency and some writing fluency (enough to write an email to a friend) and what it takes to score well in the verbal component of the SAT and write high-quality essays in English.

In Korea, it's VERY HARD to get comprehensible input for the nascent learner of Korean. VERY DIFFICULT. So comparing the exposure to the second language that a Korean gets when he/she goes to America and the exposure an average English speaker (ESL teacher typically) gets doesn't work. That's why many Korean language students are not fluent in Korean after many years of living in Korea and studying Korean. This shows how important IMMERSION is.

Of course there are those Koreans who go to America and come back to Korea without having much verbal fluency. I think these people are in the minority. If they were exposed to immersion but weren't able to pick up English speaking skills then there is something wrong with them -- they are just at the bottom of the curve when it comes to acquiring a new language. That is, IF they were truly exposed to an immersion environment. (Some people say they were but many really weren't -- they spent all their time speaking Korean and had very little interaction with others who didn't speak Korean and didn't even watch much English language TV.)

My experience is that IMMERSION is crucial for speaking fluency. The more immersion (and the input should be comprehensible so there is no point having the TV on 24/7 if you are a beginner and expecting to absorb the language that way), the faster you will become fluent (in your brain) in that language. Writing fluency flows on from speaking fluency. Without speaking fluency, it's very hard to have writing fluency (why many Korean students who have never been overseas are lousy essay writers though their grasp of English grammar might be OK).

And Korean English teachers are NOTORIOUS for having poor speaking fluency. Because of this lack of fluency, they are not good at grammar (they cannot write one page of prose without making atrocious mistakes in grammar and syntax), but still teach grammar to the Korean students. Because they pass Korean tests in English grammar they think they are capable of teaching grammar. Or they might have done a master's course in Education in an American university so think their grammar and writing skills are hot stuff ....

The reality is that they are passing on their poor English onto the students. Korean grammar books for English grammar are notoriously bad ....  

And the vicious cycle goes on. Not to say that those who come back from doing Home stay in an English-speaking country are much better in writing -- often their essay writing is of low quality -- but at least they are much better at speaking than those Korean English teachers who have never experienced immersion.

What to do for those who cannot get an immersion environment even though they try? For example, they live in Korea but can't get Korean people to speak to them in Korean for at least a couple of solid hours a day?

Watching dramas, other TV shows, dvds from the dvd store, listening to mp3 files are all substitutes. But these are not as good as natural immersion in a school, work or living with in-laws environment. And English subtitles have a perverse effect on learning. 75% of the time, the translations are not direct and the order of the words are changed a lot to fit what  English speakers are used to so even there learners are not learning direct translations and therefore miss out on a lot of vocabulary (and grammar).


Posted by honeybearsmom at 11:29 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 15 September 2011 8:15 AM EDT
Sunday, 11 September 2011
Article that influenced me

The article that influenced me a lot is a summary essay of Stephen Krashen's book.

This is the link to the article: 

http://www(dot)languageimpact.com/articles/rw/krashenbk.htm

I really believe this is true what he says about learning a language. The only area that I differ from him is that he doesn't make it clear that he is talking about speaking fluency mainly. 

One can be fluent in speaking but be illiterate in that language. That's why grammar study is important for those who want to be fluent in writing. 

However, it's best to be fluent in speaking first. This helps one to be fluent in writing. Without speaking fluency it's very difficult to be fluent in writing I think. 

I must have spoken Korean when I was young! I don't remember. But there is a recording of me as a young child singing in Korean. Obviously, I picked up Korean because I was immersed in it. 

I have to accelerate that process because I want to have speaking fluency in a year. I don't want to be hesitant when I speak and always be translating in my head ... because that's the way I am communicating now.

I don't want to waste my time too when I am learning Korean. I want to learn the most effective method FOR ME. Everyone is different as I have said and has different interests. Therefore something that is interesting for another person might be boring for me. 

I also worry about speaking too early. Krashen said one shouldn't speak until one is fluent and comfortable in speaking -- that is, not thinking too much about how one is going to say something but just saying it spontaneously. 

I also worry about people correcting me. At the moment when people hear me speaking Korean they tend to correct me especially about pronunciation which is kind of annoying. I guess it's annoying for THEM to hear Korean incorrectly pronounced but it is demotivating for me and their corrections don't help me. 

I will be speaking pidgen Korean in the early stages so will sound strange to Koreans but this is all part of the learning process. That's another reason why I don't want to speak too early -- people want to correct me and it discourages me and stresses me out.

I will have to remind people not to correct me. I don't want to speak too much but sometimes speaking in Korean is the only way I can get people to speak to me in Korean. 

Taxi drivers are pretty good. They don't try and correct me too much. They just try and understand what I am trying to say. 

I might have to pay someone to give me Korean "lessons".  However, I don't know whether it's going to work out. I would like to pay someone like Biryong because I think he's a good teacher. He knows what I need and he is fun to talk to. Some Koreans might become officious in the teaching role and just try and talk at too high a level for me. They might bore me to tears and try and correct me .... 

The main thing is to keep up my level of interest. I have noticed I HAVE improved. I understand incrementally more of what I am listening to. For example, TV is not as unintelligible as it was to me. I am picking up little "snippets" here and there. 

I think I should keep up the cycle of studying vocabulary and doing some structured listening and then watching TV and watching dramas and movies. Even I am understanding signs more. I think widening my vocabulary is useful. Of course I am going to forget some of it if I don't come across it often or soon after learning the vocabulary I've learned, but I do retain some of it and when I come across the word in a TV show etc it sticks in my head. I am picking up nuances in grammar too. I was pleased to notice I was doing this. For example, I picked up when someone was using the past tense and it was with a colloquial ending too -- "gunyo" I think it was.

Listening to dramas is helpful for picking up colloquial speech. There are a lot of colloquialisms in Korean that show up in the ending of the verbs. 

It's a bit of a mind wrap because in subtitles the verb appears in the middle but in Korean you have to wait for the end of the sentence to hear the verb. It makes matching words in English with Korean a bit difficult. 

It's funny but when I speak in English I sometimes find myself stating the subject word first even when it's not really normal to do so eg. asking a question. I did this even before I was interested in learning Korean. 

The thing I don't like about Korean is the Confucianism. I don't like the fact that you have to speak a different way to elders than you do to younger people. It's not just the Westerner in me that is reacting in this way -- I just feel fundamentally it's wrong. On the other hand, it is what makes Korean society "charming". But I find it restrictive in other ways. If you are dating a man younger than you, you can't call him 'oppa' for example. So it sets up awkwardness in these situations. Also, I find that some older people tend to use status on you. For example, my cousin who is much older than me by about twenty years at least asked me to call him "oppa" and then "cousin oppa". It kind of demoted me when I called him oppa and this was especially irritating to me as we disagree politically and calling me oppa made me feel like I was younger and more immature and had to defer to him in his opinions. 

I don't know. When I hear myself say oppa it reminds me of those girls who use the oppa term frequently on fan sites of their favorite Korean idol. I don't see myself as this giggling helpless girl who calls most men in her life "oppa" and enjoys doing so. 

I might just have to quietly dissociate myself from doing this if I can get away with it. With my cousin it's hard as he asked me specifically to do this. I think it's rude to call a much older person by their first name though that would be my preference. How about just "cousin"? That would be OK. 

So yes, it is charming in a way that there are these special terms that one uses depending on relative ages of speaker and listener but it is also restrictive, and in the end, I don't really like the system. 

There is too much emphasis on age in Korean society. In one way it keeps society cohesive and retains order in society but in other ways it's restrictive and backwards. It introduces all forms of 'ageism' -- not just against young people but against older people as well. It separates people on age and categorizes them into groups based on age, and I don't like this. 

Of course I don't want Korea to be westernized (too much) otherwise I would be living in the west if I preferred the western way of things but I don't like restrictions like this. 

On the one hand it's good that I read the article about Stephen Krashen's theories, but on the other hand, it has introduced anxieties about learning Korean. I am worried that I am not getting enough comprehensible spoken input. As I have said, it's hard to get comprehensible input for native speakers of English. If I wasn't a native speaker of English and wasn't good at English, it would be a different story. 

If I was a 3D worker, I think I would pick up the language VERY quickly. Most of the 3D workers who have been in Korea for a long time are fluent in Korean. They astonish me with their fluency. So it's not about academic skills -- it's about exposure to the right environment. Not saying 3D workers lack academic skills by the way, but many English teachers who come to Korea have academic skills and have a motivation to learn Korean but after some years are nowhere near as good as the 3D workers. 

The problem with dramas is that the situation is not immediately applicable to ME. The characters in these dramas are not speaking to me. So they aren't really communicating with me. I also do not have to try and understand either as I am not the person who is receiving the communication. I am an eavesdropper and not an active participant in the communication. Of course I can use the dialogs I hear as a model for communication when I later speak Korean a lot more. 

I realize there were many opportunities to learn Korean in the past. I remember a man who wanted to meet me and walk with me to the station when I lived in Hongdae. He didn't speak much English and he was interested in befriending him. He seemed lonely. I was lonely too but felt awkward because I felt socially we weren't in the same world. But I should have overcome that thought and made a friend of him. Perhaps if I had I would be able to speak Korean by now. Not that I want to use people that way. But he was sweet. I was just reluctant about engaging him because I didn't want to hurt his feelings. But he was REALLY interested in me. I need to keep an eye out for those people as they are nice and genuine and like me. 

I am LONELY. But bored with a lot of people I meet. I especially don't like people who find out I am from Australia and have a lot of interest in me for that reason. I can't blame them ... who's to say I wouldn't be the same if I had grown up in Korea and had not traveled much or spent much time overseas? But personally I find the responses that people make are cliched. They are predictable. They always say the same thing. They always wonder why I am in Korea. They always say Australia must be an enjoyable place to live. They are enthusiastic about that nation. They think it's a kind of paradise. They really have no idea. I don't like Australia for many reasons. I don't like the hot weather. I don't like the dry climate. I don't like the bush -- it's dry and brown and sparse. I also do not like the lifestyle. I don't like the culture much. I don't like much about Australia. I have had a lot of bad experiences there from almost Day One that I went there. I have been trying to escape from there for a long time. 

So it's hard to hear people say these things to me all the time. My cousin is an example. He is always waxing lyrical about how great Australia is and what wonderful experiences he had in Australia. He practically forced me to eat Australian beef for lunch the last time we met even though I am semi-vegetarian and I think I told him this last time. He is a Buddhist and doesn't eat a lot of meat for this reason so I think it was too much his doing this. His infatuation with Australia seems to have made him forget his values. I don't agree with him a lot on other things as well. I have mentioned the political differences we have. We just have completely different ideas about everything. 

That's what's annoying about these people. They gush about Australia and have many misconceptions about it. They seem naive. They are like this about foreign countries in general but particularly about Australia. 

If Australia is so great why am I here in Korea? They have to think about that. 

Anyway I am sick and tired of hearing the same comments about Australia with almost everyone I meet. 

Korea has many problems and aspects about it that I don't like but on balance I prefer the culture. 

Many people think Australia is a paradise because there is less competition especially less academic competition over there. But this indicates a fault in thinking of Korean people. Saying you want to go overseas and raise your children there because of the lack of academic pressure compared to Korea is kind of admitting that you want to settle for mediocrity. It also indicates that people aren't willing to think outside the box. Academic success is only one kind of success. If you are not cut out for academic success you should accept it and find out what avenue in life your future success will lie and go for it. But to think that Australia is a paradise because there is less academic pressure is ridiculous. These parents will apply the same academic pressure to their kids as they do in Korea, but they will just be more optimistic about the outcome because there is less competition. It's like saying you want to settle in a nation that encourages mediocrity. You want to be a mediocre person and you want to achieve success academically because there are loads of mediocre people you are competing with. You are the king of mediocre people in other words. And once again, they ignore the fact that there are all sorts of forms of success, not just academic success. 

If they think like that in the first place and don't think their child is capable of succeeding academically, these parents should think of other ways of getting their child to succeed in their life and career. 

What is the use of giving up culture, family ties, millennia of history and so on to settle in a nation of STRANGERS who do not share your history, culture or even the same race just because you do not think your child can succeed in the hothouse environment of hagwons and striving for the ultimate goal of SKY university entrance? In my opinion people give up too much when they emigrate to another country. There may be less academic competition but there is also non-acceptance (treatment of migrants as second-class citizens especially if they are of a race that is different to the race of the dominant ethnic group or come from a nation that is considered "inferior", discrimination and subtle racism which in my opinion is worse than overt racism), cultural dislocation (finding it hard to find people who share a similiar culture to yours and feeling isolated as a result or show a tendency to hang onto cultural 'ghettos'), difficulties in social life (finding a suitable marriage partner; feeling dissociated from people of the same race or ethnicity as yours often because you have internalized feelings of inferiority about your nation of origin and ethnicity that the dominant race/ethnicity show all the time -- often subconsciously and not overtly) including work difficulties and so on. If you are ashamed of what you are and where you come from, you are less likely to seek people of the same ethnicity as a marriage partner. 

But people do think like that. And the parents are very ambitious for themselves and end up hurting their kids immensely.

So for these reasons I find the Korean tendency to look up to western countries silly and ignorant. And this is made worse by the fact that Koreans espouse a strong nationalistic spirit. There is nothing wrong with that but when you actually note how many Koreans are willing to abandon the "mother country" completely and settle down in a western country, the nationalism seems hollow. In the one breath they are shouting "Dae Han Min Guk" and in the other breath, they state they would love to migrate to a western nation. If one is so nationalistic and patriotic why would one want to move to another nation and become the citizen of that nation? It doesn't make sense. Note that Ahn Jung Geun's descendants migrated to America. It seems many Koreans can't wait to forsake their country and live and raise their children elsewhere mostly on misguided notions about what their future lives will be like. (My parents for example.)

Enough ranting.

Back to language learning. 

I no longer find the Korean language ugly as I used to think it was. Sometimes I actually prefer the sound of Korean. And even a few times I have thought it sounded elegant and nice. 

To be honest I thought it was an inferior-sounding language for a long time. I was even ASHAMED of it. I didn't want to be Korean. I didn't want to hear Korean spoken and I was embarrassed when my parents spoke Korean in public to each other. Partly it was because I didn't understand Korean I know. But I have changed a lot. I have come to RESPECT the language. I think it's nice and I am getting used to it. It sounds normal to hear and a decent language to pronounce. Especially the connecting words "Kunde" "Kuraeyo" etc sound natural to me and sound like those words with that meaning should. 

Some words are incredibly ugly though. Some words when spoken together sound guttural and make the speaker sound unrefined. A lot of "ch's" "j's" "k's" "jang's" in speech make it sound like this. But it depends a lot on the speaker. When I like the actor speaking the lines, everything that comes out of his mouth sounds elegant, refined and nice (LOL). 

In fact these days I prefer the sound of the Korean language to English or to any other language in the world. The only other languages that I like the sound of are German and Turkish. I try to avoid English when I can because I don't want to think about the west. I change the channel when English speakers come on.

I also do not like to watch westerners speak Korean. It gives me an inferiority complex somewhat. 

I don't mind 3D workers on TV speaking Korean though. It's just mainly westerners I don't like listening to. I can't really explain this. 

I also try and avoid westerners whenever I can when I am in Korea. I don't know why I do this. Before I was interested in learning Korean I tried to befriend them. But now I don't. 

I have lost interest in all things western I guess. I am immersing myself in Korean culture. I feel annoyed that Koreans do not appreciate what they have. I think personally Koreans are happier than other people. They probably do not think they are and will rate themselves low in happiness. But they just do that because they have no basis for comparison. They do not appreciate what they have and hanker for something they don't have, for something that is foreign. It's a pity because some of them end up missing the forest for the trees. 

I don't mean that people should be COMPLACENT, but sometimes Koreans don't understand what they are doing to themselves through mistaken notions. They tend to think in black and white. Korea is black and a place to escape from, and the west is white, a paradise to run to.  And they often have no experience (except for a superficial kind of experience) of living in the west. I DO and so am in a better position to judge, IMO (I'm not saying this in an arrogant way but just stating a fact). 

I think it's because of MATERIALISM. They forsake so-called spiritual values like sense of community, sense of belonging, sense of being part of one nation and one people, sense of IDENTITY for something transient (money). No money can buy those things (things of spiritual value) once they are completely lost.  Even some parents want to rid their children completely of their former identity and encourage their kids to marry into another race and produce mixed-race children. After time and after many generations, their descendants are not recognizably KOREAN. 

That is sad for me. Why are so many Koreans like this? Are they ashamed of being Korean? If they loved their parents and honored them, why do they try and eradicate any trace of Koreanness in future generations? Don't they feel they are losing something precious? 

And at the same time, Koreans are fiercely proud of their nation. So it doesn't make sense. The really proud ones may not emigrate but they don't think less of other Koreans for abandoning their homes, lives, roots and going elsewhere. Some might wish they could do the same. 

Unless you are in trouble, for example, you have committed a crime in your country or are escaping a really difficult situation, then you shouldn't really emigrate from your home country, I mean the one that you were born in and the one where the people share the same ethnic heritage as you have. So I don't understand the emigration mentality. Go for a holiday by all means but do not make the drastic move of tearing up your roots. I think western media has influenced many people. They have grown up with Hollywood and American TV shows and been saturated with American culture. Don't they see it as shallow? 

Don't they see advantages and a sense of familiarity and safety and warmth in Korean culture? 

And the importance of family, especially extended family .. is it worth giving this up and just being a nuclear family in a strange country where the people do not accept you and think of you as inferior? Obviously some people do. They think about money 24/7 and would sacrifice ANYTHING for money. I guess it comes from having twisted values. They do not change their thinking for anything. Even if they see their children suffering because they are having problems being accepted or are not adapting to the new culture. Witness the family of Choi Seung Hui. What a tragedy. If the family had not had such shallow values and not emigrated to the US, the tragedy could have been avoided. But because the parents were selfish, greedy and stupid, they destroyed the lives of their children (his sister is also destroyed because she is forever marked as the sister of a mass murderer),  and they destroyed the lives of so many other people (the victims of the shooting who were mostly tragically young and their families). The two people ended up destroying hundreds of people.

I am surprised not more happenings like this occur. I am not at all surprised it was a Korean young man who did it. Even if I had not read about his family I could have guessed what they were like and my guesses would have been correct. I feel bad for Choi Seung Hui even though he killed so many people. In my eyes, the parents are responsible for the killings -- the son not so much. They came to the US to take from it and not to give to it, and as a consequence of their selfishness, many Americans were hurt and destroyed by their actions. 

How could the parents not know their son was suffering? That he had "problems" (social autism, trouble fitting in etc)? That he was going through mental hell. The ironic thing is that before the shootings happened they probably thought they were good parents. (They seemed proud that their daughter got into Princeton.)

This kind of event should have brought many Koreans to their senses. It did some but there are many others who still see the west with rosy eyes. Their wish is for their kids to emigrate to the US. 

I feel sorry for the kids of these people. I think their lives will be better in Korea. However, the parents don't understand this. 

 

 


Posted by honeybearsmom at 7:37 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 15 September 2011 9:39 AM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older